Publicacions CVC
Home
|
Show All
|
Simple Search
|
Advanced Search
|
Add Record
|
Import
You must login to submit this form!
Login
Quick Search:
Field:
main fields
author
title
publication
keywords
abstract
created_date
call_number
contains:
...
Edit the following record:
Author
...
is Editor
Title
...
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Book Chapter
Book Whole
Conference Article
Conference Volume
Journal
Magazine Article
Manual
Manuscript
Map
Miscellaneous
Newspaper Article
Patent
Report
Software
Year
...
Publication
...
Abbreviated Journal
...
Volume
...
Issue
...
Pages
...
Keywords
...
Abstract
International benchmarking competitions have become fundamental for the comparative performance assessment of image analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to investigating what can be learnt from these competitions. Do they really generate scientific progress? What are common and successful participation strategies? What makes a solution superior to a competing method? To address this gap in the literature, we performed a multi-center study with all 80 competitions that were conducted in the scope of IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021. Statistical analyses performed based on comprehensive descriptions of the submitted algorithms linked to their rank as well as the underlying participation strategies revealed common characteristics of winning solutions. These typically include the use of multi-task learning (63%) and/or multi-stage pipelines (61%), and a focus on augmentation (100%), image preprocessing (97%), data curation (79%), and postprocessing (66%). The "typical" lead of a winning team is a computer scientist with a doctoral degree, five years of experience in biomedical image analysis, and four years of experience in deep learning. Two core general development strategies stood out for highly-ranked teams: the reflection of the metrics in the method design and the focus on analyzing and handling failure cases. According to the organizers, 43% of the winning algorithms exceeded the state of the art but only 11% completely solved the respective domain problem. The insights of our study could help researchers (1) improve algorithm development strategies when approaching new problems, and (2) focus on open research questions revealed by this work.
Address
...
Corporate Author
...
Thesis
Bachelor's thesis
Master's thesis
Ph.D. thesis
Diploma thesis
Doctoral thesis
Habilitation thesis
Publisher
...
Place of Publication
...
Editor
...
Language
...
Summary Language
...
Original Title
...
Series Editor
...
Series Title
...
Abbreviated Series Title
...
Series Volume
...
Series Issue
...
Edition
...
ISSN
...
ISBN
...
Medium
...
Area
...
Expedition
...
Conference
...
Notes
...
Approved
yes
no
Location
Call Number
...
Serial
Marked
yes
no
Copy
true
fetch
ordered
false
Selected
yes
no
User Keys
...
User Notes
...
User File
...
User Groups
...
Cite Key
...
Related
...
File
URL
...
DOI
...
Online publication. Cite with this text:
...
Location Field:
don't touch
add
remove
my name & email address
Home
SQL Search
|
Library Search
|
Show Record
|
Extract Citations
Help